Why a stone house is better than a wooden one

You want to build a house, but did not decide with the choice of material for the construction of the building. Here it is necessary to determine the taste, functionality and budget. It is necessary to take into account the factor - the mode of residence. Some experts believe that for permanent residence it is better to erect a brick or aerated concrete structure. And if it is supposed to be seasonal, then it will be rational to build from a log or according to frame technology.

Lifetime

If you build a house for 70-100 years, then, of course, it is more correct to use a brick. With proper calculation of the foundation and wiring of engineering communications, the building will survive more than one generation. Subject to timely repair work.

A wooden log cabin in a winter forest can also stand for a long time if it stands on a good foundation and in a dry place. But even with such factors, logs require periodic attention. Timely painting will double the life of a wooden building.

Heat loss

The stone house will be warm if you use aerated concrete with a thickness of 400 mm. Blocks with a thickness of 200 mm can be used in combination with a heater. To avoid serious heat loss, it is recommended to insulate on the facade not only stone houses, but also wooden ones. For example, a house made of glued and profiled timber dried in a chamber will be expensive to operate due to large heat losses without insulation. This option is well suited for giving.

Soundproofing

The walls of a frame building and a wooden house have an average sound throughput. If you stand on the street close to the building, you can hear the echo of voices. But the stone structure has good sound insulation.

Environmental friendliness

According to experts, environmental friendliness is a conditional indicator, which affects many things. Based on the measurement of air space in the house, it is determined which particles and substances exceed the maximum permissible concentration (maximum permissible concentration). For example, for carbon dioxide or formaldehyde, aerated concrete is neutral. But with the condition that the building material is made of traditional material.

If we take into account only the tree, then we can confidently say that this is an environmentally friendly product. But if you hang PVC walls with panels, install suspended ceilings and plastic windows, any green building loses its status.

Security

A big drawback of a tree is fire hazard. Even if the house is treated with special refractory impregnation, it will only increase the burning time, but will not save the wood from a fire. If we talk about fire situations, then not only wooden buildings are burning, but also brick ones. First, the fire encompasses furniture, then decoration materials, ceilings and the roof. As a result, the stone building is deformed from the effects of fire and fire foam and water. It often happens that a stone box is already unsuitable for the restoration of the house.

Price difference

Some suggest that a wooden building is more expensive and prestigious than a stone house. This is actually not the case. For example, a house made of glued beams is somewhat cheaper than a stone structure. And if you use a screw foundation, then the costs will be significantly reduced. But as they say, there is no companion in the taste and color, therefore it is up to you to decide why a stone house is better than a wooden one.